That is, the Chinese Communist rule in dealing with the crisis of capitalism may behave democratically elected than the U.S. government better. Beijing's larger stimulus spending, in overcoming the economic slowdown on the more effective is to invest in infrastructure and direction for the further expansion of the economy to prepare.
Chinese control the economy better than the faltering when the Western democracies, the Chinese economy is roaring ahead at a steady pace in the past 30 years to about 5 billion people out of poverty, created the world's largest middle class, domestic demand provided the impetus for long-term consumption. Of course, there are a large number of China's social inequalities, but the capitalist system has always been the case.
Beijing in managing the economy to meet future challenges even better than in Washington - at least, historians, an important figure in neo-conservative intellectuals Francis Fukuyama think so. Fukuyama in the 17's freedom of thought is no longer dominated era. state-owned enterprises once again popular, large-scale incentives for Beijing selection mechanism.
Chinese leaders are now more inclined to blame the United States - nearly a trillion dollars of its debtors - not to compete. Fukuyama stressed, the survey showed less than Americans, more Chinese people believe that their country is moving in the right direction. Fukuyama writes that China's system is able to
decisions do not exclude the Chinese public
This is surprising point of view, the writer has published 19 years ago a famous speech that the Soviet Union indicates that that is, the ideological evolution of mankind the end of Western liberal democracy will spread to the final form of human government.
Fukuyama admit their mistakes that his elegant demeanor and intellectual honesty. He is not China's defense, he pointed out that China's bad habits and corruption. As he China's leaders apparently do not agree
Fukuyama Marxist education they receive tell them, between capitalism and democracy there is no necessary connection. Beijing's leaders did not imagine the free market can take care of basic needs, such as education, health care and maintaining the overall growth of the system the necessary infrastructure.
rational decision-making the United States can not effectively
but Fukuyama also stressed the lack of response to long-term U.S. system crisis. In the U.S. political system, money has become the ace of the election, the Supreme Court recognized the right to use corporate power to support strong economic management in favor of candidates and policies which, while detrimental to their business interests to resist the policies and candidates. Therefore, whether it is health reform or stimulus, the U.S. system is always either the special interest groups can not be implemented, or come up with a minority group interests rather than to meet the economic and social benefits legislation. This is not an effective and rational decision-making, can not seem to solve the long-term problems.
China the opposite. China's system can not sacrifice the needs of the entire system, so that enterprises to participate in government decision-making, to meet their bottom line. For example, U.S. pharmaceutical companies to exert political influence, so that the Government is not entitled to consult the public health system in the price of drugs. Fukuyama seems to be a warning, according to Darwin's view, the Chinese system may be more adaptive than the free country.
No comments:
Post a Comment